The State of Influencer Marketing in Europe 2025
The industry’s benchmark barometer.
- Key trends shaping 2025-2026
- Benchmarks for brands & agencies
- Platform and audience insights
Influencer marketing in the UK is actively regulated. If brands or creators get it wrong, they risk harming their reputations and hefty fines. This article breaks down the current UK regulations, how to stay compliant and the ethical concerns UK and European brands care about.

Influencers, like celebrities, form relationships with their audiences because of their credibility, trustworthiness, and homophily (the tendency to flock towards people who appear similar).
These qualities enable influencers to impact their audience's purchasing habits. 25% of all consumers, and 50% of Gen Z, have bought products based on influencer recommendations. And what's more, 53% of marketing teams who rate themselves as "effective" invest in influencer campaigns.
But as an established channel, influencer marketing is now highly regulated, with laws designed to protect influencers, brands and consumers.
In the UK, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) and the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) primarily oversee influencer marketing. Together, they set and enforce rules that govern how brands and creators promote products online. Influencer marketing in the UK also falls under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 and the UK Code of Non-broadcast Advertising and Direct & Promotional Marketing (CAP).
UK regulations include:
Regulators try to prevent advertisers from harming or lying to viewers. But are UK brands complying?
Influencer marketing regulations have significantly increased over the past decade, and UK brands strive to comply.
Kolsquare conducted a survey with NewtonX. The 2025 Kolsquare State of Influencer report includes responses from over 600 brands across France, Italy, Spain, Germany, the Benelux, the Nordics, and the UK.
The survey discovered that UK brands and agencies are heavily invested in compliance:
However, in the UK, compliance matters more than ethics. UK brands and agencies are more willing to collaborate with influencers with lower ethical standards than their European counterparts.
Here's a breakdown of how European and UK brands and agencies view ethics:
UK creators do think about ethics when choosing collaboration. This means that brands that do choose an ethical approach may have a wider choice of collaborators.
Here's how European and UK influencers view ethics in partnerships, according to Kolsquare's Voices of the Creator Economy 2025 report:
Regulations vary across Europe. UK activations previously weren't at risk of fines, but regulations have recently harshened.
The UK regulations are actively enforced. However, currently, naming and shaming is the only punishment. For example, Love Island contestant Francesca Allen was "named and shamed” for repeatedly failing to disclose ad content.
The ASA operates on a name-and-shame basis, and some argue this isn't effective enough on its own. However, the CMA now has fining powers under the DMCC Act 2024, and can impose penalties of up to 10% of global turnover for serious or repeated consumer-law breaches. Reputational damage remains a significant risk too. News articles about non-compliant brands may be the first thing shoppers see when they search a brand's name, making them less likely to purchase.
Across Europe, legislation varies. In France, failure to tag promotional posts can lead to fines of up to €300K. The European Commission is moving towards a more uniform regulatory framework, driven by concerns about misleading practices and the impact influencers have on vulnerable audiences. In the UK, the CMA can now impose fines of up to 10% of global turnover under the DMCC Act 2024 for serious or repeated breaches.
At the EU level, data-protection and digital services regulations also apply to social media posts. Advertisers must comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which sets strict rules around data collection, consent and privacy. The Digital Services Act (DSA), which came into full effect in 2024, requires large platforms and brands to be more transparent about commercial content and algorithmic recommendations.
Together, these frameworks mean that advertisers operating across Europe face more complex legal requirements than those operating solely in the UK.
UK brands care less about bullying, discrimination, the use of minors for promotions and sustainability than their EU counterparts. But why are ethics deprioritised in the UK?
It’s difficult to say exactly. There are likely multiple cultural and political issues at play.
Let's look at a few likely answers.
Post-Brexit, the UK has a more relaxed regulatory environment. EU brands are subject to stricter regulations, such as the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation and Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, which push companies to prioritise social and environmental issues.
Reuters found that 62% of UK brands care about ESG. At the same time, a study by the Boston Consulting Group found that 76% of UK consumers are actively trying to make more sustainable and ethical purchasing decisions, and they expect brands to do the same.
Additionally, 57% of consumers say their perception of a brand is directly influenced by its sustainability practices, while 30% are compelled to take action—either by switching brands or advocating for or against them—based on how a brand addresses social and environmental issues.
However, consumer enthusiasm for sustainability is waning. According to Deloitte, 61% of consumers say they have little interest in sustainability, and 47% believe that living more sustainably makes no difference. Cost is also a major barrier, and the share of consumers who have avoided sustainable actions due to expense rose from 52% in 2022 to 61% in 2024. This may help explain why some UK brands are less proactive on social and environmental issues.
But it's no surprise consumers are unwilling to shoulder the costs of ethical consumerism. UK consumers have seen the cost of living rise significantly, and high inflation has also put pressure on businesses. All of these factors may impact both brands and audiences' ethics.
Cultural differences also play a role in how businesses view their responsibility to society. European markets, especially in Scandinavia and other Northern European countries, have a long-standing tradition of integrating social and environmental considerations into business practices. UK businesses tend to have more traditional profit-driven mindsets, which may guide them towards a less ethical approach.
UK brands' lax approach to ethics may stem from their preference for more casual campaign types, such as gifting and affiliate marketing. The Kolsquare report found that 46% of UK brands leverage gifting, while 53% use affiliate campaigns.
These models give influencers creative freedom and tend to be more hands-off than fixed-fee campaigns. While this approach to working with influencers often results in authentic content, it can be difficult for brands to enforce adherence to corporate ethics. This could be the cause of the UK's more flexible approach to value alignment.
Brands may be taking a risk by not prioritising ethics when collaborating on social media posts. When a brand is perceived as unethical or collaborates with "unethical" influencers, its reputation may be harmed.
A prime case study is Molly-Mae Hague's partnership with PrettyLittleThing (PLT). Hague faced backlash after making comments perceived as tone-deaf regarding poverty and hard work, which reflected poorly on PLT. This incident was particularly damaging as it came alongside criticism that PLT was paying its factory workers below minimum wage. PLT's profits fell around the time of the incident.
In such cases, ethical missteps can lead to long-term harm, as a tarnished brand image reduces customer loyalty, negatively affects sales, and potentially limits the brand’s ability to persuade other influencers to collaborate.
Brands must set high standards, comply with regulations and uphold their ethical values. But how should they approach these issues?
The following tactics help brands stay compliant when running an IM strategy:
Whether you're a brand or a creator, staying compliant with influencer marketing regulations is non-negotiable.
Use this checklist before publishing any sponsored content:
Currently, influencer marketers and agencies in the UK aren't prioritising ethics. But the landscape is shifting:
Influencers in the UK must clearly disclose ads using labels like #ad or #sponsored in compliance with ASA and CMA guidelines. Failure to follow their rules and to correctly label sponsored posts may lead to reputational damage or fines for both content creators and advertisers.
An influencer marketing clause refers to specific terms in a contract between a brand and an influencer, outlining content expectations, sponsorship disclosures, timelines, payment details, and exclusivity. It ensures both parties meet regulatory standards and have clear obligations.
Yes, there are law firms in the UK that specialise in influencer marketing cases. Many firms offer expertise in navigating advertising laws, drafting contracts, and ensuring compliance for brands and influencers. It can help brands define intellectual property and guide them through consumer protection laws and policies.
Influencer marketing contracts set out the terms for content creation, payment, disclosure requirements, usage rights, and timelines. Though not essential for influencer marketing, they are beneficial. The basic elements of contracts are an offer, consideration, acceptance, and mutuality. These laws fall under UK contract law, similar to a freelance working agreement.
In the US, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is the primary regulator for influencer marketing. The FTC cracks down on influencers and brands who share social media posts with undisclosed ads, misleading statements, and fake reviews.
But there are other organisations at play, including the following:
Together, these regulations mean that compliance in the US goes beyond a simple disclosure. Brands and influencers need to consider the nature of the product, the audience, and the platform before posting.
Here's a guide to the influencer marketing rules overseen by the FTC in the US:
Kolsquare is Europe’s leading Influencer Marketing platform, offering a data-driven solution that empowers brands to scale their KOL (Key Opinion Leader) marketing strategies through authentic partnerships with top creators.
Kolsquare’s advanced technology helps marketing professionals seamlessly identify the best content creators by filtering their content and audience, while also enabling them to build, manage, and optimize campaigns from start to finish. This includes measuring results and benchmarking performance against competitors.
With a thriving global community of influencer marketing experts, Kolsquare serves hundreds of customers—including Coca-Cola, Netflix, Sony Music, Publicis, Sézane, Sephora, Lush, and Hermès—by leveraging the latest Big Data, AI, and Machine Learning technologies. Our platform taps into an extensive network of KOLs with more than 5,000 followers across 180 countries on Instagram, TikTok, X (Twitter), Facebook, YouTube, and Snapchat.
As a Certified B Corporation, Kolsquare leads the way in promoting Responsible Influence, championing transparency, ethical practices, and meaningful collaborations that inspire positive change.
Since October 2024, Kolsquare has become part of the Team.Blue group, one of the largest private tech companies in Europe, and a leading digital enabler for businesses and entrepreneurs across Europe. Team.Blue brings together over 60 successful brands in web hosting, domains, e-commerce, online compliance, lead generation, application solutions, and social media.